data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f2a5/7f2a58ecd1449de4f254fa03bd0d6294a84e7f90" alt="Definition obliteration"
Obliteration reduces the volume of the mastoid cavity ( 2, 9), thereby reducing the meatal size needed for effective clinic management.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc721/cc7218f5ac3f9bc5e5145114d3cb6de41909d63d" alt="definition obliteration definition obliteration"
Mastoid obliteration has been proposed to facilitate healing and epithelialization ( 8, 9), and can be performed at the original canal-wall-down procedure or in a delayed secondary procedure after the canal wall is taken down ( 9). Obliteration can be performed using a variety of techniques or materials, including but not limited to autologous bone chips and dust ( 10), hydoroxyapetite ( 11, 12), cartilage ( 13), and periosteal-pericranial flaps ( 8). Mastoid obliteration has gained increasing attention as an adjunct to open mastoid procedures ( 2, 9). These concerns have led some to primarily advocate for the use of canal-wall-up mastoidectomies ( 4), or propose the reconstruction of the ear canal-mastoid partition ( 6) or obliteration of the mastoid cavity ( 2, 7- 9). Open mastoid procedures have been criticized for the unfavorable cosmetic appearance of a large meatoplasty, the perpetual need for intermittent cleaning, as well as the propensity for chronic moisture and intermittent super-infection or drainage ( 2, 5). Despite careful observation of best practices including mastoid saucerization, removal of the mastoid tip, lowering of the facial ridge, and creation of an adequately sized meatus ( 4), moisture may persist in areas of the mastoid bowl leading to stasis of mucoid exudates, localized areas of infection, and underlying mucosal changes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5992/f599216978e71033f3abee9e536c7c25b41b119a" alt="definition obliteration definition obliteration"
Persistent moisture, infection, and drainage is problematic in as many as one-third of patients requiring revision surgery following canal-wall-down mastoidectomy ( 3), which may be attributed to mucosalized surfaces, persistent cell tracts, or poorly ventilated areas opening into the mastoid bowl ( 2). Exteriorization of attic and mastoid disease with a canal-wall-down mastoidectomy has a high rate of success in achieving a safe ear ( 1), but there is a need for continuous care including a high incidence of moisture resulting in drainage or crusting ( 3). The primary goal of surgical intervention for chronic ear disease is the development of a safe, dry, and low-maintenance ear ( 1, 2).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f2a5/7f2a58ecd1449de4f254fa03bd0d6294a84e7f90" alt="Definition obliteration"